🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the UK, and it feels like it’s time for a rethink. Over the years, an event that started out as a festivity and recollection of the past, cultural identity and bonds between Black populations worldwide, has taken on a corporate feel, growing to encompass events where African descendants are compensated to address predominantly white listeners about “unconscious bias” and active solidarity. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s sparked an increase in the industry of showcasing anti-racist commitment. But even that moment has passed. The surge has crested, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what raising awareness is for.

The Origins of Black History Celebration

Initially celebrated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with a week of celebration and reflection in the second week of February. Black History Month developed from this campaign and was officially launched in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the United States and Canada in winter, but also in autumn in the United Kingdom, Deutschland, Ireland and the Netherlands.

The period has developed since those days, focusing less on the accounts of transatlantic enslavement and civil rights battles, and increasingly on influential individuals of color in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and widely honoring the contribution Black people have made to mold society. It is in schools where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with lectures and artistic activities. But the manner the celebration is commemorated is a reflection of the current political situation. How it develops is a instructive case in how co-option leads to erosion: the restructuring of Black History Month has hindered the purpose of it, which is to tackle structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Jarring Moment

Little demonstrates how important it is to reconsider Black History Month better than the particular moment in which it takes place this year. In the Britain, a revitalized conservative movement in the guise of the Reform organization is top in opinion ratings. In the warmer months we saw the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in the UK's past. the Conservative leader, the person of color at the helm of the Conservative party, is a strong critic of anti-racism activism, and we are in a situation where a legislator gains confidence to state that a lack of white people in parts of a city is a reason for concern. Simultaneously, extreme conservative groups are surging in the European continent as a whole.

In the America, a significant offensive against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been brought, frequently with success, to the top legal institutions of the state. A drive to remove the history of people of color and experience from the historical documents is under way. One of the former president's early administrative commands aimed at the museum of African American legacy, and the renowned cultural organization, alleging that they of a organized and extensive campaign to change the national past” by depicting the United States “as naturally discriminatory”.

Against this backdrop, the observance illustrates how little it can be impactful if it is limited to either dutiful corporate observances, or stripped of political content festivities of former accomplishments, rather than addressing the situation of the current era. It also demonstrates how its limited duration means that it is disconnected from the wider consistent effort that is necessary. Denise Miller, a prof at University of Greenwich, put it best when she raised concerns about the fleeting superficial actions of the month. “The issue with taking a tokenistic approach”, she stated, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month evolves into a brief show rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Establishing how to adapt, revise and extend initiatives for equal rights and acknowledgment in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a treacherous thing. There is a temptation to just eliminate things like Black History Month entirely, assuming they are inadequate for current needs, or are vestiges of an period that has not worked.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and tradition of campaigns for equality – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, inclusion and equity efforts, and indeed, including corporate presentations – form an foundation that a significant effort has gone into. It is there not merely to decline as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, regresses), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month look like? Well, first, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is dispersed across all seasons (as certain organizations are already beginning to do), sections of its curriculum (particularly around prominent figures of color) integrated into academic syllabi. It would also be a time that does not avoid politics, and allows opportunity for people, particularly youth, to share their anxieties and narratives. What use is simple recognition of the bygone era when it fails to address the present reality of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the urban areas? Organizations who celebrate it should not be pacified with the passive language of “unconscious bias” and alertness to “microaggressions”, but faced with the dangers that affect everyone if fight against prejudice is not treated with importance. To summarize, Black History Month should be made current, pressing, and reactive. Maybe an entire name rebrand is in order – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.